Welcome to WebHeadStart.org

Web Technologies

Sponsored By

WebHeadStart.org is currently in beta.
Please pardon our appearance as we work to provide you with the most comprehensive reference on today's web technologies.

Interested in advertising on WebHeadStart? Become an advertising partner today!

[WWW-HTML Mailing List Archive Home] [Messages By Thread] [Messages By Date]

Re: Design question about formats based on XHTML 2

From: Mark Birbeck <mark.birbeck@x-port.net>
Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 08:07:29 +0100
Message-ID: <640dd5060608300007s34a58f64o6936735041d41ba0@mail.gmail.com>
To: www-html@w3.org

Hi Paul,

On 29/08/06, Paul Nelson (ATC) <paulnel@winse.microsoft.com> wrote:
>
> Shane,
>
> If you are saying that the "role" can be used by anybody for anything
> they want you will effectively generate significant disadvantage for the
> accessible community. A property that needs to be supported by browsers
> and other systems to help the assistive technology tools will be so
> flooded with other uses/misuses that there will be negative impact on
> those who need to rely on that functionality to use web content.
>
> I hope that the meaning of roles remains exactly as it is worded below
> and is not changed to be defined as "all things for all people".

The key to @role is QNames and their implied expansion to a resource
identifier, and so to the world of RDF. In that sense they can be "all
things to all people", and the disambiguation comes via the taxonomies
that Shane referred to.

Regards,

Mark


-- 
Mark Birbeck
CEO
x-port.net Ltd.

e: Mark.Birbeck@x-port.net
t: +44 (0) 20 7689 9232
w: http://www.formsPlayer.com/ 
b: http://internet-apps.blogspot.com/ 

Download our XForms processor from
http://www.formsPlayer.com/ 
Received on Wednesday, 30 August 2006 07:07:41 GMT
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS! Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | WebHeadStart.org © 2005 All Rights Reserved.